Let me ask the more specific question then. Does anyone have experience with Goldpils Vienna, and how does the flavor compare to continental Vienna malts like Weyermann, Avangard, Swaen, etc.? Is it passably close, good, no good?
no personal experience, I looked at the specs, and they look good. I wouldnt hesitate to try it, and I would bet good money your beer isnt going to taste bad because you used it instead of a continental malt. Its nice to see domestic maltsters trying to get us alternatives to continental malt
I know it's personal bias, but going way back I've found a few of Briess's malts to be rather bland, and I've hesitated to go back to them. It seems that they've put some effort in developing new products in recent years, but I haven't heard a lot of feedback on them.
+1
Recently tried Goldpils, didn't care for it. Haven't used Briess in a long time, thought I'd give this one a try.
Maybe I'm pickier than most, this batch was a dumper, which hasn't been done in a long time.
Also recently used Weyermann Vienna, and personally would choose it over Goldpils without blinking.
Smaller and closer maltsters Vienna malt I found to be best, if found and easily available.
A malt that is not popular, and/or produced in high volume, and/or coming from a long journey may be part of it.
Chances of those malts being much older/stale is greater.
Looking, smelling, feeling and tasting malts is a good indicator what I'm in for.
Anyway, that's my story and I'm sticking to it.